A Comparison Between SAFe for Government and Leading SAFe



 “SAFe for Government provides a proven framework for agencies to adopt Lean-Agile practices and deliver value to citizens faster and Leading SAFe empowers leaders to create high-performing, Agile teams that deliver value faster and with high quality.” – Dean Leffingwell, Creator of SAFe.

Why do you need SAFe for Government and Leading SAFe?

As the name implies, SAFe for Government is particularly created for government sectors. Before SAFe adoption, organizations were struggling to cope with the changing needs of digital customers. So, is for the government agencies. Increasing dependency on technology and the rapidly changing needs of the customers accelerated organizations to adopt Lean-Agile transformation. Adopting the SAFe methodology improved the organization’s ability to deliver the best quality value in a sustainable shortest lead time.

Many government technology programs are complex as it involves thousands of practitioners and government employees. As multiple teams of teams work together, the SAFe methodology provides guidance to plan and work together. It helps with maintaining cross-team work process, and integration, and encourage continuous learning for relentless improvement.

When it comes to commercial organizations which also face similar challenges, they use Leading SAFe to achieve their business improvements. Organizations to deliver value to their customers in a timely and efficient manner require teams that possess the right knowledge. The Agile practitioners must have the necessary information about the SAFe framework, its principles, and practices so that they work efficiently towards the same goal. And Leading SAFe helps organizations fill this requirement. Leading SAFe training program helps organizations to create a high-performing agile team. It helps build a team that knows how to manage a large-scale portfolio of work, prioritizing tasks, and capacity planning.



What is the difference between SAFe for Government and Leading SAFe certification?

The main differences between the two certifications are:

1.      SAFe for Government focuses on fulfilling the unique needs of government agencies while Leading SAFe certifications are for individuals who want to work in type of organization following the general principles and practices of SAFe.

2.      While the SAFe for Government involves implementing new flow-based practices in technology strategy, budgeting, forecasting, compliance, acquisitions, and governance processes. The Leading SAFe covers developing the lean-agile mindset among individuals who wants to become certified practitioner. It also helps them to learn about the scaled agile framework to plan and execute the PI properly.

3.      While Leading SAFe involves executing and delivering values via ART, SAFe for Government organizes government programs into ARTs and executes them in PIs’ large-scale solution coordination within government agencies and dealing with multi-vendor environments.

4.      Leading SAFe helps individuals become a Lean-Agile leader, establish a team and technical agility, explore Lean Portfolio Management, and acquire skillsets to lead the change. And SAFe for Government helps individuals earn specific leadership qualities to bring organizational change in the government sectors.

5.      SAFe for Government Training is useful for individuals like agile coaches, consultants, and government contractors working in government agencies. This certification can help them understand the unique challenges and requirements of government organizations.

6.      Leading SAFe certification is not limited to people like agile leaders, and agile teams with experience or expertise but also for individuals who want to learn about the implementation of SAFe frameworks in any type of organization.

7.      Job roles that can benefit from SAFe for Government are managers from the development team, ART, and engineering team members who are responsible for executing the government programs.

Prerequisites of SAFe for Government and Leading SAFe Certification

To attend the Leading SAFe certification, the candidates must have five years of experience in software development, business analysis, project management, and testing. Also, in most popular type of agile framework Scrum.

For SAFe for Government certification, the candidate must have a clear understanding of government technology programs, knowledge of the agile manifesto, SAFe principles, and the SAFe house of Lean.

Title Description

1.      What can government agencies achieve with the SAFe for Government framework?

Utilizing SAFe for Government, government agencies can produce better results for the stakeholders, taxpayers, contractors, military personnel, and citizens. It also helps them to lead a successful organizational change to overcome the barriers. With SAFe, they can build a high-performing multi-vendor team.

 

2.      What does the SAFe for Government certification cover?

The SAFe for Government Training exam includes the same topics as Leading SAFe but with additional topics that are relevant to government agencies. It teaches the ways to handle unique challenges and requirements that can be found in government environments. It deals with important considerations like regulatory compliance and security concerns in the public sector.

 

3.      How is Leading SAFe recognized in the industry?

Leading SAFe certification is one of the popular training courses among other agile certifications in the industry. As the certification is structured to change the mindset of agile leaders to implement Lean-Agile concepts in various large enterprises, it is considered to be the badge of honor.



About Advance Agility

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Decoding Agile Roles: A Comparative Study of SAFe Scrum Masters and Release Train Engineers

Image
  The SAFe Scrum Master is like the navigator of a ship, guiding the team through the Agile process and keeping everyone on course. The Release Train Engineer is like the captain, responsible for the safe and successful delivery of the cargo." In the world of Agile software development, the roles of Scrum Master and Release Train Engineer (RTE) are critical to ensuring the success of the development process. Both the roles play a vital role in facilitating the Agile process, but they differ in their approach and responsibilities. So, in this comparison blog, let’s explore the differences between the SAFe Scrum Master and Release Train Engineer roles and how they contribute to Agile development . Differences between SAFe Scrum Master and Release Train Engineer: One of the key differences between the SAFe Scrum Master and Release Train Engineer roles is their level of focus. 1.       The Scrum Master is primarily focused on the team level, while the ...
Read more

Upgrading to SAFe 6.0: What's New and Improved Compared to SAFe 5.1

Image
“SAFe helps organizations achieve alignment, collaboration, and synchronization across multiple teams, enabling them to deliver value faster and more predictably.” SAFe provides a structured approach to achieving enterprise-wide transformation. It continuously develops to keep up with the new trends and technologies in supporting business agility. Usually, it comes up with updated articles and new features that help businesses revolutionize their way of working in producing value for the customers. And as a SAFe practitioner, you need to have a clear understanding of the regular updates to lead a proper SAFe implementation at your organization. So, here we are with this article to help you understand the new updates and features that make SAFe 6.0 even better compared to the previous version SAFe 5.1 Compar ing SAFe 6.0 with SAFe 5.1 The new SAFe 6.0 comes with a new tagline “Work Differently. Build the future” which represents the idea of the entire organization working with the same ...
Read more

A Comparative Analysis Of SAFe 6.0 Configurations

Image
  “Improving workflow, the way value is created, is a continual source of advantage for the firms that do it.” With the growing need for attaining business agility SAFe framework also evolves to provide proper support to organizations to address their customer’s needs. The latest Scaled Agile Framework or SAFe 6.0 comes with a range of configurations that provides the necessary elements to implement agile practices at the program level. In this article, let’s look at the comparative study of the different configurations available in the SAFe 6.0 framework. This can help you choose the right configuration to improve your organization. That was a brief introduction to the four configurations of the SAFe 6.0 framework. Now let’s discuss them in detail. Comparing the four important configurations of the SAFe 6.0 framework As Essential SAFe is the first configuration to derive, it comes with minimal amount of feature to support new organizations. It consists of the following elemen...
Read more